← 首页|学术|PILOT: Live Self-Improvement for Long-Horizon Agents
cs.AI · 2608.26530 · 2026-08-27

PILOT in the Loop: Live Self-Improvement for Long-Horizon Agents

Yang Xiao, Yusong Sun, Haoyi Wu, Wenyang Hui, Wen Da, Zhaokai Luo, Mu Chuan, Yao Hu, Wenjie Li, Chengyue Jiang
Agent 架构Self-ImprovementLong-Horizon Agent
💬 长程 agent 不该等任务跑完了才复盘:PILOT 用「监督者-执行者」架构在运行过程中实时纠偏+实时沉淀技能,六项配置里赢了五项。

🎯 背景

现有自我提升方法大多是「事后」处理经验——任务跑完才分析,既不能纠正正在进行的run,也不能立刻应用和验证刚学到的教训。单 agent 自我纠错把执行和评估揉在一个上下文里;子agent委派虽然分离了执行,但通常无法重新定向一个正在运行的子agent。

🔬 方法

PILOT 是一个监督者-执行者(supervisor-worker)harness,包含两个耦合机制:(1) live steering——独立的监督者可以在执行过程中重新定向或中止正在运行的 worker;(2) live self-evolution——把执行中暴露出的流程和失败模式实时蒸馏成可复用的技能和记忆。

📊 结果与意义

在两个固定 backbone、三个基准上,PILOT 六项配置里五项排名第一;Terminal-Bench 2.0 上比同类 harness 高出最多 9.8 个百分点;自我提升场景下 GLM-5.1 提升 14.6 分、Kimi-K2.6 提升 12.4 分,同时平均输出 token 下降 42.9%-47.4%,每百万输出 token 的成功评测数提升 110.3%-134.0%。这种「运行中实时干预」的架构思路,和 duplex agent 里 Interaction Layer 实时介入 Thinking Layer 的设计有直接的类比价值。
▶ 原文摘要 Abstract
Long-horizon agent runs generate experience that can improve both the current run and future work. Most self-improvement methods process this experience only after execution ends, so they cannot redirect the active run or immediately apply and validate lessons learned from it. We argue that self-improvement should instead be live, using emerging experience both to redirect the active run and to update the persistent harness. Existing agent architectures do not fully support this goal. Single-agent self-correction combines task execution and trajectory assessment within one context, while subagent delegation separates execution but typically cannot redirect an active subagent. We present PILOT, a supervisor-worker harness for live self-improvement through two coupled mechanisms: (1) live steering lets a separate supervisor redirect or abort the active worker during execution; and (2) live self-evolution distils procedures and failure modes revealed during execution into reusable skills and memory. Across two frozen backbones and three benchmarks, PILOT ranks first in five of six configurations. On Terminal-Bench 2.0, PILOT outperforms counterpart harnesses by up to 9.8 percentage points. In the self-improvement setting, PILOT gains 14.6 points with GLM-5.1 and 12.4 points with Kimi-K2.6. Mean output tokens fall by 42.9% and 47.4%, while successful evaluations per million output tokens rise by 110.3% and 134.0%, respectively.
来源:arXiv:2608.26530 · 精读基于摘要与 arXiv HTML/abs 页信息生成,未解析 PDF 全文